Supreme Court places new limits on drunken driving test laws
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court has placed new limits on state laws that make it a crime for motorists suspected of drunken driving to refuse alcohol tests.
Justices ruled Thursday that police need a search warrant before requiring drivers to take blood alcohol tests. But the court declined to require a warrant for breath tests, which it considers less intrusive.
The ruling came in three cases where drivers challenged so-called implied consent laws in Minnesota and North Dakota as violating the Constitution's ban on unreasonable search and seizure. State supreme courts in each state had upheld the laws.
Drivers in all 50 states can have their licenses revoked for refusing drunken driving tests. The court's ruling affects laws in eleven states that impose additional criminal penalties for such refusals.
Desktop NewsClick to open Continuous News in a sidebar that updates in real-time.
'Excessive and unreasonable': Investigators want prosecutors to review booking room brawl
Truck drivers younger than 21 required to complete apprenticeship program before taking...
Mayor's office teaming up with state, federal partners to stop violence
Governor's budget proposal includes $500M for new Mississippi River bridge, pay raises...
Family pleads for hit-and-run driver to come forward after woman's death