Response to a New Orleans man's plea for 'lawyer dog' has internet barking
NEW ORLEANS- Did a suspect ask for a lawyer dog? Or did he call a detective "dog," while seeking a lawyer?
A Louisiana Supreme Court justice appears to side with the canine lawyer interpretation.
Defense lawyers say the confession of Warren Demesme in a New Orleans rape case should be suppressed because he asked for counsel during an October 2015 interrogation. He told investigators, "Why don't you just give me a lawyer dog ..."
Louisiana's Supreme Court allowed the confession. The majority issued no written ruling, but Justice Scott Crichton issued a separate opinion saying Demesme's "equivocal reference to a 'lawyer dog'" didn't merit stopping interrogation.
Online court watchers have ridiculed Crichton's opinion, which went beyond prosecutors' arguments. Prosecutors had not suggested that Demesme was seeking a canine attorney.
Desktop NewsClick to open Continuous News in a sidebar that updates in real-time.
Driver arrested for crashing U-Haul into police unit, other vechiles
Driver to see traffic changes along I-10 near Highland Road
Baton Rouge woman's harrowing story of survival after contracting Hepatitis A
Man in custody after eight-hour long standoff with Baton Rouge Police
All lanes now OPEN on Sunshine Bridge after tanker ship collision
'That's typical LSU;' Tailgating underway ahead of Baton Rouge Super Regional
PREVIEW: Southern breaks down Starkville Regional
LSU softball lands national No. 10 seed
Balancing Football and Track: The story of Kary Vincent Jr.
Sha'Carri Richardson's impressive impact on LSU Track and Field