Response to a New Orleans man's plea for 'lawyer dog' has internet barking
NEW ORLEANS- Did a suspect ask for a lawyer dog? Or did he call a detective "dog," while seeking a lawyer?
A Louisiana Supreme Court justice appears to side with the canine lawyer interpretation.
Defense lawyers say the confession of Warren Demesme in a New Orleans rape case should be suppressed because he asked for counsel during an October 2015 interrogation. He told investigators, "Why don't you just give me a lawyer dog ..."
Louisiana's Supreme Court allowed the confession. The majority issued no written ruling, but Justice Scott Crichton issued a separate opinion saying Demesme's "equivocal reference to a 'lawyer dog'" didn't merit stopping interrogation.
Online court watchers have ridiculed Crichton's opinion, which went beyond prosecutors' arguments. Prosecutors had not suggested that Demesme was seeking a canine attorney.
Desktop NewsClick to open Continuous News in a sidebar that updates in real-time.
Fence company owner apologizes, plans to answer to warrants
State health officials brace for troublesome cold, flu season amid coronavirus pandemic
Bar owners disciplined for violating restrictions plead for state to lift suspensions
Baton Rouge General offers post-recovery support services for COVID survivors
25-year-old man killed in West BR crash Tuesday night
Recruiting look at local WR's Chris Hilton and Brian Thomas
Friday Night Blitz: Week 1 09-25-2020
LSU changing the recruiting game with prospect led visits
LSU football returns Saturday with no tailgating, 25% capacity in Death Valley
What you need to know before you geaux to Tiger Stadium