Response to a New Orleans man's plea for 'lawyer dog' has internet barking
NEW ORLEANS- Did a suspect ask for a lawyer dog? Or did he call a detective "dog," while seeking a lawyer?
A Louisiana Supreme Court justice appears to side with the canine lawyer interpretation.
Defense lawyers say the confession of Warren Demesme in a New Orleans rape case should be suppressed because he asked for counsel during an October 2015 interrogation. He told investigators, "Why don't you just give me a lawyer dog ..."
Louisiana's Supreme Court allowed the confession. The majority issued no written ruling, but Justice Scott Crichton issued a separate opinion saying Demesme's "equivocal reference to a 'lawyer dog'" didn't merit stopping interrogation.
Online court watchers have ridiculed Crichton's opinion, which went beyond prosecutors' arguments. Prosecutors had not suggested that Demesme was seeking a canine attorney.
Desktop NewsClick to open Continuous News in a sidebar that updates in real-time.
A&E show featuring EBR first responders to air Thursday
BRPD: Suspect arrested in connection to two Tuesday shootings
Denham Springs moves forward in restoring the 'springs' it was named after
It's too hot, resident at senior living apartment wants AC fixed
French Settlement police chief indicted in malfeasance case